Return to Candy by James homepage

Bite Size Standards launches

Bite Size Standards: Bite back the web

Bite Size Standards, a pro­ject that has taken up quite a lot of my time has launched today. It was ini­ti­ated by John Oxton of Joshuaink fame, but as CSS guy all parties had to deal with me, so I ended up doing and influ­en­cing a lot. It’s been really fun to work with the whole team and it’s been par­tic­u­larly great to finally shush out some semantic and access­ib­il­ity quer­ies. So for now, I’ll just leave you with a descrip­tion of what Bite Size Standards is.

Bite Size Standards aims to offer con­cise web devel­op­ment tutori­als, tips and tricks. Written by design­ers and developers who are pas­sion­ate about web standards.

A full slightly longer write-up of what we actu­ally went through and why we did cer­tain things will come a lot later and can be found on my port­fo­lio.

Have a look at more Buzz or Web or Worthy

7 Responses to “Bite Size Standards launches”

  1. John Oxton says:

    And a crack­ing great job you did too! Thank you :)

  2. What you guys are doing is great but you kind of nar­rowed the scope of the pro­ject. May be that is inten­tional. I have no way of know­ing it. In my humble opin­ion though, it would have been much more use­ful if it was bites­ize­code instead of stand­ards because code implies pro­gram­ming thus bits of php, asp, jsp, javas­cript or whatever code would have been the most indis­pens­able of all.

  3. John Oxton says:

    I don’t see why we have nar­rowed the scope by using the word Standards, every tech­no­logy has a stand­ard, be it CSS, HTML, ASP, ECMAscript, Fireworks, Flash ActionScript, Photoshop, Textpattern, PNG, GIF, JPEG.

    The word Standard was chosen to emphasis qual­ity, not nec­cesar­ily ‘web stand­ards’ but just things that work to a stand­ard, pre­frably a high one.

  4. Sean Fraser says:

    James,

    I look for­ward to your con­cise explan­a­tion of reason for using HTML 4.01/Strict on the site. I’ve noticed — over the last six months — numer­ous redesigns have gone from XHTML/Transitional to Strict as well as a few sites hav­ing “regressed” to HTML 4/Strict.

    Nicely done.

  5. Including this one Sean :)

    It’s as much “regressed” as “get­ting ready” for HTML 5.

    Mohodin : We’re not lim­it­ing ourselves to code, and besides, “stand­ards” sounds better.

  6. John and AkaXakA, I appear to have got­ten you wrong. Somewhere in my mind, stand­ard was equated with web stand­ards. In other words, that was my first impres­sion and I am not prob­ably alone. yes John every tech­no­logy has a stand­ard and cod­ing is no exception.

    Thanks for the clarification.

  7. Heiko says:

    Absolutely great job. Thx for this pos­ted link, I didn’t know yet.

Possibly related content

  1. Why I use HTML (instead of xHTML)
  2. About my CSS Zen Garden Entries
  3. Noscope redesigned: Pangea launched!
  4. Guess who’s nr. 1 for ‘Webdesign Portfolio’ ?
  5. Blah blah blah: It’s the content silly!